In the past, I’ve been very reluctant to post personal opinions on sensitive subjects, especially those that I know that whatever I write, there will be someone to offend. By my nature I do not like offending people (unless the offend me first). I am conflict-averse, and I prefer to stay on people’s positive sides. I wouldn’t say I’m a kiss-up, just that I feel uncomfortable when people think negatively of me. But recently, Joyce suggested that I learn how to be more open, that I be more open to speaking my mind without fear of being wrong or being disliked. As she said, it’s fine to have some people not like me. If nobody has issues with me, then I’m lacking personality.
While she was referring more to speaking my mind in general, I decided to try speaking out on a specific topic that I’m almost certain will offend some, especially with me being a California resident. If you don’t know, Proposition 8, if passed, will ban same-sex marriage in California. Just taking a quick survey of Facebook statuses will show that there are some pretty strong supporters of voting against it, with the chant of “Don’t eliminate marriage for anyone” and “Marriage equality for all”.
And that brings me to the shocker of this post: I support Prop 8. I know of at least a handful of friends, if not more, who would be offended by or at least disapprove of my stand. But I’ve made my decision to state it. I have personal reasons why I’m against allowing gay marriage. I also have logical objections to the arguments for gay marriage. But this post is not about either of them. Today, I am writing about my philosophical issues with those the “No” camp in general (not of any particular person).
California is pretty liberal, especially northern California where I currently reside. And coming from Berkeley, I am no stranger to the extreme side of liberalism. The Bay Area is so liberal in fact, that I have come to conclude it is almost a fad to have liberal opinions. I feel like it is popular to go against tradition, to complain over the smallest things, to hold protests for the sake of protesting. It’s the “in” thing to do; everybody’s doing it.
Example: the recent clamor for Tibetan independence and protesting China’s hosting of the Olympics. While this isn’t necessarily a liberal position, without going into whether I support Tibetan independence, I’ll say that I firmly believe a good number of the people protesting were doing so out of mob mentality. A relatively small number of people who passionately and sincerely supported independence started the fire, and then people who wouldn’t care otherwise care happened to observe them. Then it started to snowball, and soon it became cool to be anti-China in any way possible. And at that point people started to scream for Tibetan independence when seriously, I don’t think they even sincerely cared from their hearts. I mean, some of these protesters couldn’t even point out Tibet on a map. Can such a person really say they care about the issues when they don’t even really know the most basic details about it?
But I digress. I mean to talk about gay marriage here. The Bay Area is liberal enough that it’s become popular to think that allowing gay marriage is “revolutionary” and “the right thing”. While I’m sure there are some who do feel strongly about the concept, this post isn’t about them. My opinion is that a large number of people who scream at others to vote no are only doing so for the sake of, to put it unsophisticatedly, being rebellious. To me, these are the people who will go against convention just because they think it’s cool to do so. These are the people who will sit in trees to protest cutting down trees that no one will miss. These are the people who will protest the pledge of allegiance in public schools due to mention of God. These are the people who will say gay marriages are good because disallowing them is the status quo, and the status quo must be bad.
And that brings me to the main point of this post: my philosophical issues with gay marriage are founded upon my observations that much of the sentiment in favor of allowing it is little more than peer pressure and the desire to fit in with the rest of liberal California. Yes there are independent thinkers out there who support gay marriage out of their own will and beliefs. But for the others, this is simply yet another outlet to demonstrate one’s liberalism. Taking a liberal position because you feel strongly about it is one thing; I may not agree with it but I can at least respect it. But taking a liberal position because everyone you know is doing it, without even knowing the facts, is just ridiculous. I don’t have issues with people who flat out don’t care about the issues either. (I’m often one of those people.) I just cannot stand people who clamor and whine about something they probably will no longer care about in a few years.
I don’t claim conservatives are immune to the same mob mentality. It’s just that at least in California, there isn’t enough conservative momentum for the same problem to occur, and thus if a person here takes a conservative stand on some issue, I can usually be reasonably sure he is sincere in his opinion. If I were in a heavily conservative state, I might have the opposite view.
So, elections are coming up in a couple weeks. I’ve already stated my view, I won’t try to persuade you one way or another, at least not today. All I’m saying is, this time, and any time in the future where you find yourself about to take a stand on some issue, you should ask yourself, “What do I really think about this issue, and do I really care about it?”